question everything
EUROMYTHS & REFERENDUM DEBATE LIES
They say that the first casualty of war is always the truth. We’re not at ‘war’ as such with the EU but based on our difficult relationship with them over the years you might be forgiven for thinking we were. It’s a very British tradition to lampoon and belittle our enemies. I’m not sure how far it goes back but for many the depiction of Napoleon as an angry French midget is the first recollection.
'I’m not sure how far it goes back but for many the depiction of Napoleon as an angry French midget is the first recollection'.
'Many of them have a tiny germ of truth based on proposed legislation but in every case that germ has been extrapolated into a whale size portion of bullshit.'
My personal favourite is the idea that we would have to rename all of our foodstuffs in Latin. The headline screamed ‘Eurocrats force Britain to rename fish and chips – Gadus Morhua (cod) ‘n’ chips will now be on the menu at your local chippy!’ Not true of course. The whole story came from the very sensible notion that it would be a good idea to standardise food names across the EU to avoid confusion. This would help to ensure that anyone going into a grocery store describing an avocado in Spanglish wouldn’t come out with a hand grenade.
And while we’re at it; it was never the EU’s idea for us to go metric. The UK committed itself to gradually going metric in a white paper in 1972, a year before it joined the European Community. But once in, its obligation to make the switch was formalised. Another Euromyth bites the dust. (2)
It’s so transparent it’s laughable and do you know who is responsible for a lot of it? Boris Johnson.
Bojo was the Telegraph’s Brussels correspondent from 1989-1994 and made up one outrageous story after another. He was sacked from the Times because of his passing acquaintance with the truth, but that didn’t seem to bother the Telegraph. Mostly it’s been pretty harmless; there’s no question he has a knack for dressing lies up in like an engaging whore in red light window. But here he is now as a figurehead for the BREXIT campaign and the lies have escalated into something far more serious.
EU costs, Democracy and Control
We’ve already covered these in previous pages. The ‘EU cost’ lie however, is by far and away the biggest lie in this debate and despite the claim being withdrawn it’s unfortunate to note that some of the electorate still believe it. A sobering reminder of how earworms like this can infect a population faster than the SARS virus.
​
Britain’s exposure to the Eurozone
Another scaremongering lie. In this one he claims that the Government is unable to ‘protect the UK taxpayer from the demands of the Eurozone countries for bail-out funds’. Not true; The UK has a veto on the overall size of the EU budget and it's already been agreed that non-Eurozone countries won't have to pay for future Eurozone bailouts. (3)
​
Turkey entering the EU
This is the lie that Boris Johnson and his sidekick Michael Gove have been spreading about Turkey’s impending membership of the EU. The idea behind it is to scare voters into voting for exit on the basis of the immigration issues that Turkey’s membership could pose for Britain. Vote Leave has warned repeatedly over the potential for 76 million Turkish citizens to gain the right to work in the UK if the country joins. However, they know full well, as everyone else does who has acquainted themselves with Turkey’s position, that it will not happen for decades, if at all.
​
As Labour’s Yvette Cooper says, ‘Michael Gove and Boris Johnson’ know all of those things, they’re not stupid - but they are deliberately manipulating the facts, they are deliberately telling lies, in Boris Johnson’s case for his own personal interest, and it is shameful, utterly shameful. I don’t know how they live with themselves.’ (4) (5)
​
Britain should remain a sovereign nation
This is a concept that dates back to the Magna Carta and is a tradition that is uncompromising about accountability and steadfast in the conviction that power should rest only in the hands of leaders elected by, and answerable to, the nation. In this way the EU, BREXIT campaigners claim, breaks the sacred bond of mutual power between decision makers and those on whose behalf they act. But it’s all hogwash.
Even excluding the EU, Britain is subject to some 700 international treaties involving multi-lateral submissions to multilateral compromises. Its membership of the UN similarly infringes its self-determination (it can be outvoted there just as it can in Brussels). Likewise the WTO, NATO, the COP climate talks, the IMF, the World Bank, nuclear test ban treaties and accords on energy, water, maritime law and air traffic etc. etc. Yet it submits to all of these knowing that, as with the EU, it is free to leave whenever it wants—but at a price not worth paying. If sovereignty is the absence of mutual interference, the most sovereign country in the world is North Korea. Good luck with that…
Sovereignty in this day and age is relative, it’s never absolute. A country that refuses to pool authority is one that has no control over the effect of its neighbours and how their actions may transcend its boundaries. Regulation and standards be they financial, economic, security related or practical are vital to ensure cohesion rather than division. To live with globalisation is to acknowledge that many laws (both those devised by governments and those which surface as a natural consequence) are here to stay whether we like it or not. (6)
We can puff our chests out as much as we like but the reality is Britain is not now, and hasn’t been for donkey’s years, a sovereign nation; and even if we were to leave the EU tomorrow it would make no difference to that fact.
This famously gave rise to the term, ‘Napoleon Complex’ which suggests short men try to make up for their lack of stature by being overly aggressive and domineering. It’s not true of course; it can apply to men of any size and in fact research has shown tall men are more likely to spit their dummy out, and with greater frequency, than shorter men – it’s just that if we see a more diminutive fellow acting in this way we identify with it and that’s how myths get reinforced and propagated. In Napoleon’s case it wasn’t true anyway; recent research reveals that he was 5’6”, which would have been above average height for French men at that time; but as with many Euromyths, no-one wants the facts to ruin a good story.
Really the big issue here once you strip everything else away is ego. Britain is used to giving orders not taking them and the critics view is that the EU undermines the British tradition of the inviolable sovereignty of parliament. That’s why you’ll hear all the rhetoric about giving up control to Brussels; as if the politicians in Brussels could be any worse than the clowns we have here running this country.
Britain big problem is an assumption that our system is better, just because it’s ours. Therefore the issue of ‘control’ has become a major sticking point and this manifests itself in many ways.
At the more serious end of the scale we have the most often repeated lies about the EU being undemocratic and that it controls all our law without us having a say; which, as we’ve already seen, is not true. As we head down to the depths we then have the famous Euromyths of the 90’s and beyond which includes the curvature of bananas amongst many others. All good stories, but none of them are true.
Once you understand the motivation, you’ll start to understand why British politics and the press have systematically lied about so much of what has gone on in the EU – and what may happen if we stay in. Their job is to paint the politicians in Brussels as a bunch of buffoons who don’t know their arses from their elbows and who luncheon everyday on moules et frites drenched in mayonnaise whilst concocting one new stupefying rule after another. The Euromyth is now legendary and although they’ve been debunked many times before the latest research shows that around 15% of Brits still buy into at least one of them: (1) Straight bananas, barmaids having to cover up their cleavages, a ban on corgis and firemen’s poles, changing the name of Bombay mix to ‘Mumbai mix’ and of course regulating the size of condoms, to name but a few. Many of them have a tiny germ of truth based on proposed legislation but in every case that germ has been extrapolated into a whale size portion of bullshit.
'We can puff our chests out as much as we like but the reality is Britain is not now, and hasn’t been for donkey’s years, a sovereign nation; and even if we were to leave the EU tomorrow it would make no difference to that fact.'
Pro-European myths
In the interest of balance we also need to assess some of the muck the other side have been spreading. But really the only outright misrepresentation is what the Remain campaign has said regarding the cost of exit to UK families. Here Cameron has stated that BREXIT would (note, he didn’t say could) cost your family £4,300 a year. But that’s not the cost to your family directly, it’s based on the cost in terms of GDP, which is simply the difference the Treasury says this will make to the economy divided by the number of households; which doesn’t actually tell you what would happen to any particular household. (6)
In tandem with this there are also predictions linked to the same report about rises in interest rates, taxes and cuts to the NHS. These, however, aren’t misrepresentations in the truest sense of the word as the figures can be ‘proved’ by referencing the economic model the Treasury has created to measure the potential downside of BREXIT. Of course it’s biased, but then it’s no more biased than the BREXIT campaigns own economic models.
Summary
Euromyths have been with us ever since we joined the EU and now number in their hundreds. They are designed to give the impression that the EU is a bureaucratic system that forces unworkable and plainly ridiculous laws on its member states. There is a germ of truth in this, but mostly the concerns are unfounded. But in any event it should not take our eye off the fact the our own government is far from blameless in this respect. Here are a few that will make you smile:
​
Top 5 Most ridiculous British laws:
1. It is an act of treason to place a postage stamp bearing the British monarch upside-down.
2. In Liverpool, it is illegal for a woman to be topless except as a clerk in a tropical fish store.
3. In Scotland, if someone knocks on your door and requires the use of your toilet, you must let them enter.
4. In the UK a pregnant woman can legally relieve herself anywhere she wants, including in a policeman's helmet.
5. In the city of York it is legal to murder a Scotsman within the ancient city walls, but only if he is carrying a bow and arrow.
​
The sheer volume of lies and misrepresentations concerning this debate is almost unprecedented, but you’d be wrong to assume that both sides are equally to blame. There is a big difference.
'Bare faced lies assume that you are idiotic enough to believe them and if that’s the BREXIT campaigns view of the British people the question you need to ask yourself is are they right?'
BREXIT campaigners have been involved in spreading a series of bare faced lies (lies they know have little if no foundation in the truth) to fool the British public into voting out. The Pro-Europe campaign have simply been using an economic model and extrapolating the data to produce figures to scare people into voting in. When doing this one can use the statistics to prove anything one likes because it can’t be disproved. It can only be challenged using other models that are more positive from the opposition; which are, in themselves, in any event generated by assumptions concerning an unknown effect – so you see the problem.
​
One is most certainly not the same as the other. In the end you should remember this; if one side of a debate cannot convince you of their argument with the truth alone then they do not deserve your vote, plain and simple. Bare faced lies assume that you are idiotic enough to believe them and if that’s the BREXIT campaigns view of the British people the question you need to ask yourself is are they right?
​
​
​
Sources:
1 - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6481969.stm
3 - http://europe.newsweek.com/boris-johnson-london-mayor-telegraph-brussels-dispatches-429010 )
4 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36462016
6 - http://www.economist.com/blogs/bagehot/2016/02/bojo-breaks-ranks
7 - https://fullfact.org/europe/4300-question-would-leaving-eu-really-make-every-household-worse/
Copyright: GAG 2016 all right reserved – no part of the content of this website, text or images can be used, duplicated or broadcast without prior authorisation.